Este trabajo tiene un doble propósito. Por un lado, pretende polemizar acerca de algunas cuestiones conceptuales del pensamiento suareciano, acaso no siempre comprendidas en todo su alcance; por otro, exponer la originalidad y la importancia de la contribución de este autor a la configuración de las principales vías que sigue la filosofía jurídica moderna y sus desarrollos posteriores. Y para ello, por razones de extensión y oportunidad, se centra en la cuestión de la validez normativa, cuyo fundamento y estructura permite (...) tanto una crítica de las principales teorías contemporáneas, como dar cuenta de la vigencia esencial de la contribución de Suárez a la teoría jurídica y constitucional. (shrink)

The purpose of the present paper is to demonstrate a series of connections in terms of concepts and subjects between Ockham and Kant’s philosophical models that may provide a comprehensive framework for their respective insights on Law. Our main thesis postulates the existence of a continuum of certain fundamental assumptions derived from Nominalist theology and enlightened rationality that contribute to the essential unity of so-called “modern thought” and how such continuity is projected in the legal domain. In this sense, we (...) suggest the need to reflect upon the tacit Nominalism underlying Kantian criticism, which, although devoid of all theological premises, reconstructs metaphysics while preserving its basic scheme. In order to do so, our starting point is a very brief reference to the similarities between their respective theories of knowledge. We go on to analyze the structure behind moral actions according to Ockham and Kant’s doctrines. Finally, we point to certain founding principles and elements common to both doctrines in the field of legal-political thought. (shrink)